What should be the evaluation outcome for a situation with one GL not rotating?

In synchro skating, a group's ability to execute a glide line (GL) effectively is critical to the overall performance and scoring. When evaluating a situation where one glide line does not rotate, the key aspect to consider is the integrity and execution of that element. If only one GL fails to rotate, despite the potential success of others, the overall feature does not align with the requirements for it to be counted positively.

The decision to not count the feature stems from the principle that all components in a group element must demonstrate the expected level of execution to achieve credit. A glide line that fails to rotate disrupts the cohesiveness and synchronization that is essential for a successful performance. Therefore, when one glide line does not fulfill its required action, the feature is deemed incomplete, reflecting a failure to meet the necessary criteria for counting.

In contrast, if another glide line rotated correctly, it does not compensate for the shortfall of the GL that did not rotate. The evaluation process adheres strictly to the principles of synchro skating, which demand that all parts of a feature function effectively as a whole. Thus, the correct determination is that the feature is not counted due to the failure of one significant element to perform as required.