What is the error count when there is one fall during the execution of a feature?

When there is one fall during the execution of a feature in synchro skating, the correct count of errors reflects the intensity of the mistake made. Each fall is known to be categorized distinctly within the technical requirements of the performance.

In this scenario, the fall is identified as a specific element of the performance that is flawed. Therefore, it is marked as a call element, which acknowledges that the fall occurred while attempting a recognized feature or skill that was part of the program. Additionally, the "fall" itself is considered a significant error that must be recorded separately.

This results in two separate errors: the failure of the execution of the feature (the call element) and the fall itself. Thus, the proper evaluation for that situation indicates that both components are recorded, leading to the conclusion that one must account for both the acknowledged failure of the feature and the fall when counting errors.

Other responses do not conceptually encompass the dual nature of the consequences when a fall occurs, as they may suggest a single error or a different type of downgrade that does not fully reflect the complexity of the situation. The distinction between these components is critical in understanding the overall scoring and evaluation in synchro skating.