What happens if 1/4 of the team executes multiple errors during a point of intersection?

When a quarter of the team executes multiple errors during a point of intersection, the impact on the program's score is influenced by how the execution aligns with the established judging criteria. In synchro skating, errors in execution can lead to deductions that affect the overall technical score.

The correct response indicates that for each individual error committed, the performance indicator (pi) is lowered by one level. This means that if multiple errors are made within the same point of intersection, the cumulative nature of these infractions is recognized in the scoring system. This is significant because it ensures that teams are incentivized to maintain precise execution, especially in high-stakes areas like intersections where coordination is critical.

In contrast, the other alternatives do not accurately reflect the rules governing scoring in such situations. For instance, receiving a higher score contradicts the penalty system designed to encourage better performance. Lowering the pi for just one error or only counting the first error does not take into account the multiplicative effect of multiple errors, which would be detrimental to the team's performance assessment. Thus, recognizing each error individually to lower the performance level promotes accountability and encourages teams to strive for flawless execution.