If a collapse occurs after a skater achieves a fixed lifted position at GL4, what is the appropriate action?

When a skater achieves a fixed lifted position at a level four (GL4) and subsequently experiences a collapse, the action taken reflects the severity of the error related to the execution of the element. In this case, calling for element GL3 and lowering the element one level appropriately accounts for the fact that the intended difficulty of holding the lift at GL4 has not been maintained due to the collapse.

This choice recognizes that the integrity and control required for the level four lift were compromised, necessitating a reduction in the level to GL3 to accurately reflect the skaters' performance. A collapse during a lift signifies a significant error, impacting the overall execution and safety, thus justifying the decision to lower the element for this severe error.

Maintaining the level at GL4 would overlook the impact of the collapse on the element's performance standards and skill execution. Calling for GL2 would not properly reflect the severity of the error that occurred as a result of the collapse. Therefore, calling for GL3 and adjusting the level downward effectively describes the situation and ensures that scoring accurately aligns with the performance outcome.